Seni Retorika Nabi Amos dalam Membumikan Pesan Keadilan Sosial
Analisis Retorika dalam Kitab Amos 5:7-13
Abstract
Penelitian ini menggali seni retorika yang terkandung dalam Kitab Amos 5:7-13, dengan fokus pada penggunaan bahasa oleh Nabi Amos dalam mengungkapkan pesan keadilan sosial. Analisis retorika dilakukan untuk menyelidiki bagaimana seni retorika digunakan untuk membentuk pesan moral dan sosial, khususnya dalam konteks keadilan. Melalui pendekatan analisis retorika ini mengidentifikasi suara dominan yang mencakup ketidakpuasan terhadap ketidakadilan dan menyoroti konflik sosial di dalamnya. Hasilnya, penelitian ini menyajikan pemahaman mendalam tentang bagaimana seni retorika membentuk pesan moral dan sosial, dan sekaligus menjelaskan urgensi keadilan sosial dalam konteks kitab suci tersebut. Kesimpulannya, seni retorika Nabi Amos dalam Kitab Amos 5:7-13 menjadi cerminan kebijaksanaan moral yang mendalam, menantang pembaca untuk merenung dan bertindak dalam membangun masyarakat yang adil.
References
Ackroyd, Peter R. 1978. “P. R. ACKROYD, Isaiah I-XII: Presentation of a Prophet.” In . https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:170931516.
Adiatma, D L, A Susilo, S Yermianto, P S Chia, A Harvijanto, N G Laoly, N Anggraito, A N Kirk, E Lestari, and P K Baskoro. 2023. Suara Injili: Kumpulan Esai Teologis. CV. Lumina Media. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ubGzEAAAQBAJ.
Andrew E. Hill & Joh. H. Wilton. 2013. “Survey Perjanjian Lama,” 1–44.
Barker, John Robert. 2017. “Disputed Temple: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Book of Haggai.” Disputed Temple: A Rhetorical Analysis of the Book of Haggai, 1–295.
Boaheng, Isaac. 2022. “A Thematic and Literary Analysis of Amos 5:4-7, 10-15: Implications for Ghanaian Leaders.” E-Journal of Religious and Theological Studies, no. September: 241–52. https://doi.org/10.38159/erats.2022884.
Boyd, Frank M. 2000a. Kitab Nabi-Nabi Kecil. Malang: Gandum Mas.
Bullock, C. Hassell. 2014. Kitab Nabi-Nabi Perjanjian Lama. Malang: Gandum Mas.
Finley, Thomas J. 2003. Joel, Amos and Obadiah. Biblical Studies Press.
Gitay, Yehoshua. n.d. “A Study of Amos’s Art of Speech: A Rhetorical Analysis of Amos 3:1-15.” The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 42, no. 3.
Gomes, Nancy R. 2012. “The Book of Amos and Social Justice.” Journal of Religion and Popular Culture 24, no. 3.
Janzen, J. G. 2013. Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah. Westminster: John Knox Press.
Keil, C.F. dan Franz Delitzsch. 2021. Commentary on Amos. The Expository Times. Vol. 132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014524621994458.
Kennedy. n.d. New Testament Interpretation.
Lindblom, J. 2011. “Kitab Amos.” In The Dictionary of Biblical Imagery. Surabaya: Momentum.
Linville, J. R. 2017. Amos and the Cosmic Imagination. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=WfhADwAAQBAJ.
Meynet, Roland. 1998. Rhetorical Analysis: An Introduction to Biblical Rhetoric. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series.
Moller, Karl. 2003. A Prophet in Debate: The Rhetoric of Persuasion in the Book of Amos. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series. Vol. 372.
Motyer, J. A. 2016. The Message of Amos. Vol. 01. Illinois: IVP Academic.
Osborne, Grant. n.d. Spiral Hermeneutika. Surabaya: Momentum.
Radine, Jason. 2010. The Book of Amos in Emergent Judah. Germany.
Renz, Thomas. 2002. The Rhetorical Function of the Book of Ezekiel. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.
Saputra, Anon Dwi, Daniel Adiatma, and Saul Gurich. 2021. “Suatu STUDI NARASI: INTERAKSI AMOS DENGAN AMAZIA DALAM KONTEKS VISI KETIGA (AMOS 7: 10-17): Interaksi Amos Dan Amazia Dalam Konteks Visi Ketiga (Amos 7: 10-17).” SCRIPTA: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pelayanan Kontekstual 12, no. 2: 105–22.
Saputro, Anon Dwi. 2023. “Penggunaan Kutipan Amos 9:11-12 Dalam Kisah Para Rasul 15:18-20 Sebagai Lensa Misional.” HUPERETES: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen 4, no. 2: 128–39. https://doi.org/10.46817/huperetes.v4i2.195.
Van Gemerem, Willem A. 2016. Pengintrepetasian Kitab Para Nabi. Surabaya: Momentum.
Watson, Duane F., and Alan J Hauser. 1994. “Rhetorical Criticism of the Bible: A Comprehensive Bibliography with Notes on History and Method.” Biblical Interpretation Series 4.
White, Aaron W. 2016. “Revisiting the ‘Creative’ Use of Amos in Acts and What It Tells Us about Luke.” Biblical Theology Bulletin 46, no. 2: 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146107916639210.
Copyright (c) 2024 Anon Dwi Saputro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Jurnal Misioner articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Users are free to copy, modify, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any media as long as they give appropriate credit to the original author and Jurnal Misioner as the publisher. They have to links to the license, indicate if changes have made, and redistribute any derivative works under the same license.
Article copyright is held by the respective author (s), without limitation. A non-exclusive license is granted to Jurnal Misioner to publish articles, identify itself as the original publisher, and only use them for non-commercial purposes.
By publishing articles in Jurnal Misioner, authors grant rights to third parties to use their papers to the extent granted by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
